|
Post by thehumanshishkebeb on Jun 25, 2004 10:06:24 GMT -5
Bloody Murder was quite a good film i thought it was better than Friday the 13th well not the first one but better than some of the others. I've been hearing alot about trevor moorhouse but found out hes not the main killer in the film but some guy called nelson.He does appear from time to time but you dont really see him kill anyone eccept see him stick a chainsaw in the ground. I liked the way that they showed different clips of different murders trying to trick you into thinking its one of them. I would rate it 7 out of 10 it was quite a good film and kept me entertained,the story was ok but not great. there wee some absolutely pitteful scenes,such as when Nelson kills a girl in the storage section she just stands there acting like a complete idiot but most films have that stupidity now adays but i expected better from a film made back then. but it was still a good film gave me somthing to do i suppose...
|
|
|
Post by RumbleWolf4 on Jun 26, 2004 20:11:10 GMT -5
That a fact? that good? Ive heard nothig but absolutely craptacular reviews for the first film and some so-so reviews for the sequel...hmmm...
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Jun 27, 2004 3:25:11 GMT -5
I've heard the sequel is better than the original.
|
|
|
Post by thehumanshishkebeb on Jun 27, 2004 12:52:49 GMT -5
i liked the film bloodey murder because of their sad little attempt at trying to trick you into who the killer is....some stupid newspaper says trevor moorehouse is killer...while the name nelson is flying around and they have a guy jason that they didn't show die but they showed some guy walk up to him ehhh am i giving alot of the film away... well anyone who rated bloodey murder crap can't see a good horror film.... lets take friday the 13th and friday the 13th part 5 in those films you didn't know who the killer was... all the others its jason... same with halloween its michael ehhh...
but with bloodey murder its good the way they dont reveal the killer at the beginning, they show trevor moorhouse kill some guy so that you think its him killing everyone. then they show scenes of other camp members killing people but there not ehhh go see the film and you might understand a word im saying...
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Jun 27, 2004 12:55:12 GMT -5
No. I'm not. But it sounds convincing.
|
|
|
Post by suicidenotes on Jun 30, 2004 20:35:09 GMT -5
I thought the movie was pretty decent. The special effects aren't great, but who gives a fuck. Its too much special effects and cgi that makes newer type movies horrible. The Story is pretty good and acting is good, so i'm fine with this movie. I still haven;t saw part 2, but i'm hearing its great.
|
|
|
Post by Ghostface on Jul 11, 2004 11:04:13 GMT -5
I heard that both movies sucked
|
|
|
Post by DeraiLer on Jul 11, 2004 19:25:37 GMT -5
I have seen part 2 and it was alright. A Horror movie really has to suck for me not to like it. I might enjoy part one.
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Jul 12, 2004 6:38:47 GMT -5
I didn't like Bloody Murder, becuase it ripped off alot of famous scenes from other horror films. I could have wrote a more original movie.
|
|