|
MOTM?
Oct 5, 2004 9:50:39 GMT -5
Post by Akasha on Oct 5, 2004 9:50:39 GMT -5
Me? Lol, I've been a good girl
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 5, 2004 20:03:08 GMT -5
Post by L-Face on Oct 5, 2004 20:03:08 GMT -5
Well, you're welcome. Now, who will be MOTM for October. That's an extra important MOTM.....Halloween and all. That shall be me! My time is long over due. That and I should be newbie of the year too!
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 5, 2004 22:39:08 GMT -5
Post by Madness on Oct 5, 2004 22:39:08 GMT -5
I've always liked the idea of having members vote on things like this except for one small problem. A lot of people will do the following... 1. Get as many people as they know to vote for them, that's not what being a member of the year is about. 2. They'll create multiple accounts to gain more votes if that's what it takes. 3. My vote is the only one guaranteed to be impartial. I think member of the year should be whoever has been MOTM for the most times in that particular year. It could be done still Chucky. If anyone creates more accounts there could be a punishment such as your name is taking out of the running or even banned. As for getting people to vote for you, well thats just campaining, anyone caught making promises could also be banished, you could make the ballats secret, pms to you or someone you trust. If the ballots are secret then no one would know if they really bullied them into voting.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 5, 2004 22:52:46 GMT -5
Post by WesCraven on Oct 5, 2004 22:52:46 GMT -5
You make many good points Chucky... yes perhaps just Chucky choosing (or Chucky and a few others that he selects) would be the best course of action.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 5, 2004 22:58:04 GMT -5
Post by Shadow on Oct 5, 2004 22:58:04 GMT -5
You make many good points Chucky... yes perhaps just Chucky choosing (or Chucky and a few others that he selects) would be the best course of action. Wes is right, either way Chuck would figure something out if he decided to do that
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 0:34:09 GMT -5
Post by RationalGaze on Oct 6, 2004 0:34:09 GMT -5
You make many good points Chucky... yes perhaps just Chucky choosing (or Chucky and a few others that he selects) would be the best course of action. Yes, like all the mods vote, thats a good idea.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 16:18:12 GMT -5
Post by Chucky on Oct 6, 2004 16:18:12 GMT -5
Yes, like all the mods vote, thats a good idea. I was just about to suggest something like that, perhaps all staff members.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 17:51:07 GMT -5
Post by Madness on Oct 6, 2004 17:51:07 GMT -5
That could work as long as they either could not vote for themselves or be taken out of the running.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 18:10:41 GMT -5
Post by Chucky on Oct 6, 2004 18:10:41 GMT -5
Or maybe we could have nominations and only those who have been nominated can vote, not vote for themself but vote for someone else who was nominated and do that by casting their vote in a PM to me.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 18:20:36 GMT -5
Post by Madness on Oct 6, 2004 18:20:36 GMT -5
That works as long as you have and odd number in case of a tie or someone only you know as the secret tie breaker. All good ideas, guess it comes down to your choice but as FE won't be around much longer according to Zombie, no need to worry.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 18:58:47 GMT -5
Post by Chucky on Oct 6, 2004 18:58:47 GMT -5
That works as long as you have and odd number in case of a tie or someone only you know as the secret tie breaker. I'd be the tie breaker.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 19:00:37 GMT -5
Post by Madness on Oct 6, 2004 19:00:37 GMT -5
Well that would make sense. Good plan Chuck.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 20:21:49 GMT -5
Post by WesCraven on Oct 6, 2004 20:21:49 GMT -5
I think that'd work well.... though we still have several months to come up with other ideas (if we decide these won't work).
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 6, 2004 22:31:23 GMT -5
Post by Madness on Oct 6, 2004 22:31:23 GMT -5
True Wes Craven.
|
|
|
MOTM?
Oct 7, 2004 0:42:00 GMT -5
Post by RationalGaze on Oct 7, 2004 0:42:00 GMT -5
Should I start handing out buttons, bumper sticks, and eating kissing babies?
|
|