|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Feb 26, 2004 5:34:52 GMT -5
I would have said Stephen King and yes he does direct movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by omega Ho-Tep on Feb 26, 2004 9:21:41 GMT -5
Sam Raimi
|
|
|
|
Post by Chucky on Feb 26, 2004 9:48:26 GMT -5
Hmmm, probably Tim Burton or Paul Verhoeven.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pennywise on Feb 26, 2004 11:11:13 GMT -5
Honestly, I couldn't care less. Really, the director isn't important to me. I especially hate the followers of drectors who go crazy when a crappy movie directed by their favorite director is out. Honestly, they can make a good movie at first, then make a shitty movie. The director really doesen't matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Feb 27, 2004 5:13:54 GMT -5
In some cases the director is important, it depends on how talented they are.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lavaboy on Feb 28, 2004 21:39:44 GMT -5
From the following horror directors I liked:
John Carpenter: They Live, Prince of Darkness, The Thing
Lucio Fulci: City of the Living Dead, House by the Cemetary
Tobe Hooper: The Funhouse
Wes Craven: The Hills Have Eyes
George Romero: Dawn of the Dead, Martin
Ruggero Deodato: Cannibal Holocaust
Dario Argento: Suspiria
Others...
Jorg Buttgereit: Schramm, Nekromantik
Stuart Gordon: Dagon, Re-Animator, Castle Freak
Sam Raimi: Evil Dead 2, Army of Darkness
Peter Jackson: Dead-Alive, Bad Taste
Anyway, the director i like the most is John Carpenter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Mar 1, 2004 5:23:11 GMT -5
John Carpenter is making crap movies now though, just look at Ghosts of Mars.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pennywise on Mar 1, 2004 16:42:12 GMT -5
From the following horror directors I liked: Tobe Hooper: The Funhouse You have to of had been blind to like that piece of shit movie. |
|
|
|
Post by Lavaboy on Mar 1, 2004 19:21:18 GMT -5
I'd rather look at all the good films Carpenter has produced before he went on a slump with crap like Vampires and Ghosts of Mars.
The Funhouse was a good movie, dude. You're the blind one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pennywise on Mar 2, 2004 19:24:50 GMT -5
The Funhouse was a good movie, dude. You're the blind one. It IMO, was horrible. Horrible acting, the main character(The jock.), DIES, even though he was the only useful character besides the nerd(The only part that scared me was when the jock guy accidently killed the nerdy character with an AXE. The axe stuck to the guy's head was damn creepy.) who also died. The women were annoying, their screams hurt my ears. And the villians blowed. An alien in a Frankenstein outfit? Some dumb hillbilly hicks to boot make this a very shitty movie all the way. |
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Mar 3, 2004 5:23:45 GMT -5
I've heard bad for this movie though i am yet to see it.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Magician on Mar 3, 2004 13:43:39 GMT -5
1) John Mctiernan.
He directed Predator!
Therefore he rules!
(I don't know any other movies of his, but still.)
2) Wes Craven
3) John Carpenter
Those would be next in place.
|
|
|
|
Post by WesCraven on Mar 4, 2004 1:11:06 GMT -5
in my opinion, "Funhouse" was OK... nothing special, and easily not one of Hooper's better films...
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Mar 4, 2004 5:25:08 GMT -5
Hooper was never really the best director anyway
|
|
|
|
Post by Pennywise on Mar 5, 2004 16:14:41 GMT -5
Hooper was never really the best director anyway Never liked Hooper's work over here, either. |
|
