|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Oct 19, 2004 5:20:23 GMT -5
I thought you said the people on IMDB were idiots, lol. I don't want to see any other remakes done. Period. Someone has to get some new ideas for horror movies. I'm sick of remakes. Bub, any TV remake is horrible. I can trust the IMDB users this time. lol |
|
|
|
Post by Chucky on Oct 19, 2004 5:53:41 GMT -5
That piece of shit truly needs a remake. |
|
|
|
Post by Elkwoodjack on Oct 19, 2004 5:59:21 GMT -5
Does it need to have ever existed?
I think remakes are ok when they're a total re-imagining of the original, like The Thing or Dawn '04,but when its fecking scene for scene *coughpsychocough* then it can burn in hell. As for a remake I'd like to see- Bad Taste, but only if Peter Jackson himself does it.
Fat chance though...
|
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Oct 19, 2004 15:18:59 GMT -5
I think remakes are ok when they're a total re-imagining of the original, like The Thing or Dawn '04,but when its fecking scene for scene *coughpsychocough* then it can burn in hell. Amen to that, Elk. Psycho's remake was a complete waste of time, why make it shot for shot? Are they just figuring people want to see the exact same thing!? The Thing and DOTD are two of the best remakes I've seen, and Invasion of the Body Snatchers was pretty damn good, too. |
|
|
|
Post by The Magician on Oct 19, 2004 15:51:18 GMT -5
The Thing and TCM are my favorites, but I didn't like Dawn of the Dead. Of course that didn't surprise me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pennywise on Oct 19, 2004 21:32:09 GMT -5
The remake of The Thing is more proof that Carpenter is a god.
Bub, what helped make the Psycho remake was the good cast. Vince Vaughn was great as Norman Bates. The remake was fair, but I'd prefer the heavily overrated original over it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Oct 20, 2004 15:01:48 GMT -5
Eh, Vaughn was decent enough. At least he didn't try to go exactly in the same fashion as Perkins in the original.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Oct 21, 2004 5:21:06 GMT -5
Eh, Vaughn was decent enough. At least he didn't try to go exactly in the same fashion as Perkins in the original. Vaughn was alright as Norman Bates, but i believe there were better actors for the role. Vaughn didn't really look like the original Norman Bates enough. |
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Oct 21, 2004 15:22:31 GMT -5
Well, at least the movie was different from the original in one other way other than being worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pennywise on Oct 21, 2004 20:18:49 GMT -5
I liked Vaughn's role in the film. It was the only good one.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Oct 22, 2004 5:24:32 GMT -5
Well, at least the movie was different from the original in one other way other than being worse. Well the remake was better than the sequels made for Psycho. Except maybe Psycho 2, that wasn't to bad. |
|
|
|
Post by Pennywise on Oct 23, 2004 12:42:27 GMT -5
Psycho III was decent, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Oct 23, 2004 15:01:47 GMT -5
I haven't seen any Psycho sequels, I believe part 3 is on Monsterfest.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Oct 24, 2004 4:58:07 GMT -5
You should try to see Psycho II, Bub. Sure its not as good as the original but not much movies in any franchise are actually better than Psycho anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Oct 24, 2004 9:21:33 GMT -5
I'll check it out, I think it's on Monsterfest, too.
|
|
