|
Post by Darigaaz on Dec 13, 2004 3:59:20 GMT -5
People like the Leprechaun play around to much, and if the Leprechaun is up againsed another powerful horror icon who is usually serious i believe the serious horror icon would win. I just dont see the Leprechaun doing much...
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on Dec 13, 2004 7:30:12 GMT -5
People like the Leprechaun play around to much, and if the Leprechaun is up againsed another powerful horror icon who is usually serious i believe the serious horror icon would win You mean like Myers
|
|
|
Post by crashdummie on Dec 13, 2004 10:30:01 GMT -5
Come on guys... Anyway, Chucky and the Lep are not even in the same "movie world" if you know what i mean. Anyway, I have something to tell to Lepindahood. Maybe you hate me because i always argument with you, but i don't hate you lep. I respect your choice and i respect you. You're just a bit too insistent on inimportants things. Ok?
|
|
|
Post by LepInDAHood on Dec 13, 2004 14:02:58 GMT -5
Come on guys... Anyway, Chucky and the Lep are not even in the same "movie world" if you know what i mean. Anyway, I have something to tell to Lepindahood. Maybe you hate me because i always argument with you, but i don't hate you lep. I respect your choice and i respect you. You're just a bit too insistent on inimportants things. Ok? Ok, you have a point, but there's still one thing I don't get. Why do people judge by popularity? Everything should be judged by statistics. Ok, you have a doll possessed by the soul of a killer who basically kills people with a knife or some other weapon. You have a Leprechaun with unlimited magical ability and his wits about him. On paper, the Lep holds an advantage. So if someone is asked to choose the winner, they say something like, "Oh the Child's Play films were better, I pick Chucky to win." I think that blows. I mean, think of it as a sports match or something. If you go to Washington, they might tell ya that they like the Redskins better than the Eagles, and that they're gonna win, and they end up losing. I mean, just because you like someone doesn't mean they're gonna win. And I know someone's gonna have to agree with this post.
|
|
|
Post by DeraiLer on Dec 13, 2004 14:25:47 GMT -5
Strait up, Green bean! Rawhead would own Jason!
|
|
|
Post by LepInDAHood on Dec 13, 2004 14:31:22 GMT -5
Strait up, Green bean! Rawhead would own Jason! Well what chance does a retarded killer like Jason or Leatherface stand against the masses of smart and clever killers?
|
|
|
Post by Chucky on Dec 13, 2004 14:33:51 GMT -5
Well what chance does a retarded killer like Jason or Leatherface stand against the masses of smart and clever killers? Pretty damn good chance since Jason beat the so-called "intelligent" Freddy in FvsJ.
|
|
|
Post by LepInDAHood on Dec 13, 2004 14:35:35 GMT -5
Pretty damn good chance since Jason beat the so-called "intelligent" Freddy in FvsJ. Ask Robert Englund himself, nobody won, Freddy was still alive.
|
|
|
Post by Chucky on Dec 13, 2004 14:41:14 GMT -5
Ok, you have a point, but there's still one thing I don't get. Why do people judge by popularity? Everything should be judged by statistics. Ok, you have a doll possessed by the soul of a killer who basically kills people with a knife or some other weapon. You have a Leprechaun with unlimited magical ability and his wits about him. On paper, the Lep holds an advantage. So if someone is asked to choose the winner, they say something like, "Oh the Child's Play films were better, I pick Chucky to win." I think that blows. I mean, think of it as a sports match or something. If you go to Washington, they might tell ya that they like the Redskins better than the Eagles, and that they're gonna win, and they end up losing. I mean, just because you like someone doesn't mean they're gonna win. And I know someone's gonna have to agree with this post. Yeah but you're not counting every statistic. The fact that the Leprechaun barely uses his powers in his movies shows that he's either stupid or has limited ability with them, that is also a statistic and should be taken into account. How hard is it for someone to hide behind a wall to dodge some kind of magic attack and then beat the shit out of them once they've used it up? You've got to just take more than their "weapons" into account here. Hey, if they were to make a Chucky vs Leprechaun movie, Chuck would be the "good guy" and not just because it says it on his clothes but because he's now like an Ash character, Leprechaun has got nothing to offer as the movies' hero. He's going to be the enemy and will most likely fall.
|
|
|
Post by Chucky on Dec 13, 2004 14:43:31 GMT -5
Ask Robert Englund himself, nobody won, Freddy was still alive. God damn, can't the side of Freddy let it go? Jason was the last one standing, just because Robert Englund says nobody won doesn't mean shit. That's like Kane Hodder saying he got screwed out of playing Jason in the movie, does everyone believe it just because he said it? No. Jason = last one standing = winner. Freddy got served.
|
|
|
Post by LepInDAHood on Dec 13, 2004 14:48:53 GMT -5
Well in Freddy vs. Jason, Freddy was the bad guy, and seemed to have more power. If Leps the bad guy, he'll be the one with more power, and because of that, be cheered on by the masses.
|
|
|
Post by LepInDAHood on Dec 13, 2004 14:53:34 GMT -5
God damn, can't the side of Freddy let it go? Jason was the last one standing, just because Robert Englund says nobody won doesn't mean shit. That's like Kane Hodder saying he got screwed out of playing Jason in the movie, does everyone believe it just because he said it? No. Jason = last one standing = winner. Freddy got served. You might not find many people who agree with you on this one. In fact, instead of Robert Englund, why not ask the writers of the script.
|
|
|
Post by Chucky on Dec 13, 2004 15:14:18 GMT -5
Well in Freddy vs. Jason, Freddy was the bad guy, and seemed to have more power. If Leps the bad guy, he'll be the one with more power, and because of that, be cheered on by the masses. That's a pretty thick opinion. Comparing Freddy's greatness to Lep's? People cheered on Freddy, not because he has powers or because he was the bad guy, they meerly cheered him on because half of the people who watched the movie were Freddy fans. C'mon, there's more Chucky fans out there than Leprechaun. He'll be the one getting cheered on more. Hardly anyone likes the Leprechaun, you can't even buy parts 5 and 6 of his movies out here in Australia because no one even wants to see them. Lep will be the quiet enemy in the corner who gets smited. As for the script writer for FvsJ, ever wondered why they actually used his script? Because it makes it look like there was no winner so Freddy fans don't get their undies in a twist when they find that Freddy got served. It's the Freddy fans biggest excuse for why he didn't win. Excpt the fact that Jason was the last one standing and that they're more likely going to make Freddy look like the winner in FvsJ part 2.
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Dec 13, 2004 15:30:13 GMT -5
If Leps the bad guy, he'll be the one with more power, and because of that, be cheered on by the masses. [/color] [/quote] Lep + cheered on = Odds: A billion to one
|
|
|
Post by DeraiLer on Dec 13, 2004 19:21:15 GMT -5
Is everyone forgetting Leprechaun in Space? That movie was awesome!
|
|