|
|
Post by Bub on Dec 14, 2004 16:11:21 GMT -5
Here's the poster for "Boogeyman."  While the poster is decent, if you ask me, this looks reaaaaaaaally similar to the god awful dissapointments "Darkness Falls" and "They", also about a men tarumentized when they were young by "child fears." This one looks like it's on the way to sucksville to me. Here's the trailer. www.apple.com/trailers/sony_pictures/boogeyman/ |
|
|
|
Post by Seed on Dec 14, 2004 17:10:19 GMT -5
It looks decent and Raimi's directing, so it should be good.
|
|
|
|
Post by ChrissyM on Dec 14, 2004 17:59:19 GMT -5
Is this the Stephen King Boogeyman?
|
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Dec 14, 2004 18:56:41 GMT -5
It looks decent and Raimi's directing, so it should be good. Raimi's not directing. He's actually producing with Rob Tapert. I've lost all faith in him anyway after this "blasphemous" Evil Dead remake idea. And no, it isn't the Stephen King Boogeyman. |
|
|
|
Post by DeraiLer on Dec 14, 2004 19:10:29 GMT -5
I lost faith in him after the Grudge remake. I thought it would be a great horror film with raimi attached.  |
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on Dec 14, 2004 20:42:38 GMT -5
I lost faith in him after the Grudge remake. I thought it would be a great horror film with raimi attached. Well, it wasn't a horrible movie. I must say, at least this trailer is better than the 'War of the Worlds' trailer |
|
|
|
Post by Madness on Dec 14, 2004 21:43:25 GMT -5
The preivew looks better then some, But thouse can be misleading...So you just never know.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Dec 15, 2004 4:34:06 GMT -5
It may be good, but i'm not to sure right now...
By the way Bub, you sure say "decent" alot. lol
|
|
|
|
Post by Shadow on Dec 15, 2004 8:02:15 GMT -5
By the way Bub, you sure say "decent" alot. lol He uses that word more that I do? Damn, he must use it a lot then.  Oh, and I forgot to mention, I think that I saw this trailer off of some site before, though I'm not totally sure which one it was. It looks like it might just be a ok or 'decent'(  ) time waster... nothing much more, and probaly nothing much less. |
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Dec 15, 2004 15:38:37 GMT -5
By the way Bub, you sure say "decent" alot. lol that actually never occured to me. However, a can't make a decent estimate at this point the decency of my posts, but I think overall, they're decent. |
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Dec 16, 2004 3:50:28 GMT -5
that actually never occured to me. However, a can't make a decent estimate at this point the decency of my posts, but I think overall, they're decent. Lol. I only just noticed Bub's constant "decent" usage this month... He didn't really use the word until recently. |
|
|
|
Post by Bub on Dec 16, 2004 16:03:33 GMT -5
Back on topic.......
........I think the film will mostly get so so reviews and reaction from fans and horror reviewers. Frankly, the PG-13 horror flick situation is getting out of control.
|
|
|
|
Post by Darigaaz on Dec 17, 2004 4:19:01 GMT -5
Out of control? Theres been something like 3 PG 13 horror films made in recent times.
|
|
|
|
Post by WesCraven on Dec 17, 2004 5:42:20 GMT -5
Well, 3 is a bit low I think... I mean it partially depends on what you consider a horror movie... but here's some released this year off the top of my head...
"The Village"
"Van Helsing"
"The Grudge"
"Darkness" (not released yet)
"The Phantom of the Opera" (not released yet)
that's five (not including the film OF this thread: "Boogeymen") off the top of my head, and I'm sure it's probably much more.... I agree with Bub: the PG-13 horror film craze is getting a little lame...
|
|
|
|
Post by L-Face on Dec 17, 2004 12:26:27 GMT -5
I probably won't end up seeing it. But I guess it looks decent.
|
|
